bargainlobi.blogg.se

• Vikings score. free#

My short answer to Michael’s question is this: I want to believe. Whether or not teams deploy this strategy is a frequent point of conversation. The question has league-wide ramifications. Or the Vikings could agree to take on more money to find a team willing to take on Cook’s contract in exchange for some package of draft assets.ĭo you believe in the competitive rebuild? My biggest fear with the Vikings is that they never allowed the team a true reset, which means bottoming out, getting a lot of quality draft picks and figuring out the future at QB. With mandatory minicamp approaching, Cook’s camp, seeing the lackluster market for the running back, could decide he’d be best suited to take a payout to remain in Minnesota. So it’s unlikely that this week’s calendar turnover results in a move. Instead, Minnesota has waited, opting instead to secure Cook via a pay cut or trade him for future draft capital.

Vikings score. free#

Several months ago, the Vikings could have cut Cook normally, absorbed his dead-cap hit, and then used the nearly $6 million of cap savings toward signing a high-end free agent. Most of Cook’s money resides in his base salary. But it’s not because the benefits would be minimal. If the post-June 1 cut was the obvious way to handle Cook’s situation, the Vikings could have made that move months ago. Teams can designate players as post-June 1 cuts prior to June. Conversely, when a team releases a player with the post-June 1 designation, only the player’s base salary hits the books for that season. Note: The questions were edited lightly for length and clarity.ĭo the cap savings of trading or cutting Dalvin Cook after June 1 make him moveable? - Scott H.Ī quick lesson on the post-June 1 cut: When a team releases a player under normal circumstances, all of what he is owed accelerates onto the team’s salary cap for that season.